Abe, J. O., Popoola, A. P. I., Ajenifuja, E. & Popoola, O. M. Hydrogen energy, economy and storage: Review and recommendation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44, 15072–15086 (2019).
Lubitz, W. & Tumas, W. Hydrogen: An overview. Chem. Rev. 107, 3900–3903 (2007).
Mosca, L. et al. Process design for green hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45, 7266–7277 (2020).
Hora, C., Dan, F. C., Rancov, N., Badea, G. E. & Secui, C. Main trends and research directions in hydrogen generation using low temperature electrolysis: A systematic literature review. Energies 15, 6076 (2022).
Pal, D. B., Singh, A. & Bhatnagar, A. A review on biomass based hydrogen production technologies. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47, 1461–1480 (2022).
Younas, M., Shafique, S., Hafeez, A., Javed, F. & Rehman, F. An overview of hydrogen production: Current status, potential, and challenges. Fuel 316, 123317 (2022).
Shiva Kumar, S. & Lim, H. An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production. Energy Rep. 8, 13793–13813 (2022).
Osman, A. I. et al. Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 20, 153–188 (2022).
Shiva Kumar, S. & Himabindu, V. Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis: A review. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2, 442–454 (2019).
Kojima, H. et al. Influence of renewable energy power fluctuations on water electrolysis for green hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 48, 4572–4593 (2023).
Konieczny, A., Mondal, K., Wiltowski, T. & Dydo, P. Catalyst development for thermocatalytic decomposition of methane to hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 33, 264–272 (2008).
Abdelhamid, H. N., Goda, M. N. & Said, A.E.-A.A. Selective dehydrogenation of isopropanol on carbonized metal–organic frameworks. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 24, 100605 (2020).
Abdelhamid, H. N. A review on hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of sodium borohydride. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46, 726–765 (2021).
Kassem, A. A., Abdelhamid, H. N., Fouad, D. M. & Ibrahim, S. A. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and MOFs-derived CuO@C for hydrogen generation from sodium borohydride. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44, 31230–31238 (2019).
Abdelhamid, H. N. UiO-66 as a catalyst for hydrogen production: Via the hydrolysis of sodium borohydride. Dalt. Trans. 49, 10851–10857 (2020).
Abdelhamid, H. N. Salts induced formation of hierarchical porous ZIF-8 and their applications for CO2 sorption and hydrogen generation via NaBH4 hydrolysis. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 221, 2000031 (2020).
Hussein Hashem, Z., Abdel-Rahman, L. H., Gómez-Ruiz, S. & Nasser Abdelhamid, H. Cerium-organic framework (CeOF) for hydrogen generation via the hydrolysis of NaBH4. Results Chem. 7, 101412 (2024).
Balat, H. & Kırtay, E. Hydrogen from biomass: Present scenario and future prospects. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35, 7416–7426 (2010).
Ajanovic, A., Sayer, M. & Haas, R. The economics and the environmental benignity of different colors of hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47, 24136–24154 (2022).
Abdelhamid, H. N. Dehydrogenation of sodium borohydride using cobalt embedded zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. J. Solid State Chem. 297, 122034 (2021).
Abdelhamid, H. N. Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-8, ZIF-67, and ZIF-L) for hydrogen production. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 35, e6319 (2021).
Iqbal, M. N. et al. Mesoporous ruthenium oxide: A heterogeneous catalyst for water oxidation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 9651–9656 (2017).
Wang, Y., Pang, Y., Xu, H., Martinez, A. & Chen, K. S. PEM fuel cell and electrolysis cell technologies and hydrogen infrastructure development: A review. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 2288–2328 (2022).
Faye, O., Szpunar, J. & Eduok, U. A critical review on the current technologies for the generation, storage, and transportation of hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47, 13771–13802 (2022).
El-Bery, H. M. & Abdelhamid, H. N. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation via water splitting using ZIF-67 derived Co3O4@C/TiO2. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9, 105702 (2021).
Saleh, M. R., El-Bery, H. M. & Abdelhamid, H. N. Co@ZIF-8/TiO2 heterojunction for green hydrogen generation. Appl. Organomet. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.6995 (2022).
Ni, M., Leung, M. K. H., Leung, D. Y. C. & Sumathy, K. A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11, 401–425 (2007).
Ashokkumar, M. An overview on semiconductor particulate systems for photoproduction of hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 23, 427–438 (1998).
Wang, Q. & Domen, K. Particulate photocatalysts for light-driven water splitting: Mechanisms, challenges, and design strategies. Chem. Rev. 120, 919–985 (2020).
Suguro, T., Kishimoto, F. & Takanabe, K. Photocatalytic hydrogen production under water vapor feeding: A minireview. Energy Fuels 36, 8978–8994 (2022).
Xia, C. et al. Emerging cocatalysts in TiO2-based photocatalysts for light-driven catalytic hydrogen evolution: Progress and perspectives. Fuel 307, 121745 (2022).
Bamwenda, G. R., Tsubota, S., Nakamura, T. & Haruta, M. Photoassisted hydrogen production from a water-ethanol solution: A comparison of activities of Au–TiO2 and Pt–TiO2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 89, 177–189 (1995).
Nikitenko, S. I., Chave, T., Cau, C., Brau, H.-P. & Flaud, V. Photothermal hydrogen production using noble-metal-free Ti@TiO2 core–shell nanoparticles under visible–NIR light irradiation. ACS Catal. 5, 4790–4795 (2015).
Khorashadizade, E. et al. Intrinsically Ru-doped suboxide TiO2 nanotubes for enhanced photoelectrocatalytic H2 generation. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 6116–6127 (2021).
Epelle, E. I. et al. A comprehensive review of hydrogen production and storage: A focus on the role of nanomaterials. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47, 20398–20431 (2022).
Saleh, M., Abdelhamid, H. N., Fouad, D. M. & El-Bery, H. M. Enhancing photocatalytic water splitting: Comparative study of TiO2 decorated nanocrystals (Pt and Cu) using different synthesis methods. Fuel 354, 129248 (2023).
Nada, A., Barakat, M., Hamed, H., Mohmaed, N. & Veziroglu, T. Studies on the photocatalytic hydrogen production using suspended modified photocatalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 30, 687–691 (2005).
Eder, M. et al. Size and coverage effects of Ni and Pt co-catalysts in the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from methanol on TiO2 (110). ACS Catal. 12, 9579–9588 (2022).
Biswas, S. et al. Black TiO2–x nanoparticles decorated with Ni nanoparticles and trace amounts of Pt nanoparticles for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 4, 4441–4451 (2021).
Xu, Y. & Xu, R. Nickel-based cocatalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Surf. Sci. 351, 779–793 (2015).
Wang, W., Liu, S., Nie, L., Cheng, B. & Yu, J. Enhanced photocatalytic H2 -production activity of TiO2 using Ni(NO3)2 as an additive. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 12033–12039 (2013).
Li, J. et al. Metal–organic framework-based materials: superior adsorbents for the capture of toxic and radioactive metal ions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 2322–2356 (2018).
Jing, D., Zhang, Y. & Guo, L. Study on the synthesis of Ni doped mesoporous TiO2 and its photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution in aqueous methanol solution. Chem. Phys. Lett. 415, 74–78 (2005).
Tian, H. et al. Fabrication of an efficient noble metal-free TiO2-based photocatalytic system using Cu–Ni bimetallic deposit as an active center of H2 evolution from water. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 134, 309–317 (2015).
Luna, A. L. et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution using Ni–Pd/TiO2: Correlation of light absorption, charge-carrier dynamics, and quantum efficiency. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 14302–14311 (2017).
Li, L., Cheng, B., Wang, Y. & Yu, J. Enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of bicomponent NiO/TiO2 composite nanofibers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 449, 115–121 (2015).
Bahruji, H., Bowker, M., Davies, P. R., Kennedy, J. & Morgan, D. J. The importance of metal reducibility for the photo-reforming of methanol on transition metal-TiO2 photocatalysts and the use of non-precious metals. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 40, 1465–1471 (2015).
Sreethawong, T., Suzuki, Y. & Yoshikawa, S. Photocatalytic evolution of hydrogen over mesoporous TiO2 supported NiO photocatalyst prepared by single-step sol–gel process with surfactant template. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 30, 1053–1062 (2005).
Kudo, A., Domen, K., Maruya, K. & Onishi, T. Photocatalytic activities of TiO2 loaded with NiO. Chem. Phys. Lett. 133, 517–519 (1987).
Yu, J., Hai, Y. & Cheng, B. Enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of TiO2 by Ni(OH)2 cluster modification. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 4953–4958 (2011).
Chen, X. et al. Oxygen vacancy-induced construction of CoO/h-TiO2 Z-scheme heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 28945–28955 (2022).